Updated ETGet the DI Daily by Email

AI news for e-commerce professionals, with our take on why it matters.

RecoGEM paper reports generative recommendations served under 35 ms at 1,000 QPS

The authors say the system has run in production for over nine months, serving apps with hundreds of millions of users and more than ten model families.

Source: arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval)

A paper posted to arXiv's information retrieval section describes RecoGEM, a serving system for generative recommendation, an approach in which a model generates item identifiers step by step instead of scoring a list of candidate items. The authors say the approach promises higher recommendation quality but makes serving much harder, and that neither conventional recommender pipelines nor existing LLM serving stacks fit it well.

RecoGEM splits the work between a dedicated runtime, which handles tasks such as candidate-state transitions and live artifact updates, and an execution engine tuned for the short token sequences and large candidate pools typical of generative recommendation.

According to the authors, the system has been deployed for over nine months across their production lines, serving applications with hundreds of millions of users and supporting more than ten model families. On their OneModel production workloads, they report over 1,000 queries per second per serving instance, P99 latency below 35 ms and 2.88x the throughput of representative baselines. The abstract does not name the company that runs it.

Read the full article at arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval)

Our take

Latency and serving cost have kept generative recommenders out of many product feeds, and this paper reports both handled at large scale in production.

  • Ask recommendation vendors whether they run generative models and what latency they guarantee.
  • Treat the figures as self-reported: the operator and baselines are not detailed in the abstract.

Was our take useful?

Key takeaways

  1. RecoGEM reports over 1,000 QPS per instance with P99 latency below 35 ms
  2. Authors claim 2.88x throughput over representative baselines
  3. Paper says it has run in production for over nine months, across 10+ model families

Original reporting

arXiv cs.IR (Information Retrieval)

Read the original report

Published